Excerpts from the link above:The 70,000 figure covered the worst period, before aid agencies were given greater access to Darfur. The number of deaths in the camps has now fallen, but either side of the six-month period there will still have been substantial deaths, campaigners say.
We just don't know the scale of the problem Dr Koeburgh
Added to this, is a figure for how many may have been killed in the violence.
Amnesty International's best estimate for how many may have died from violence since the conflict began - which took account of attacks on hundreds of villages - is 50,000.
The UN's emergency relief coordinator Jan Egeland has admitted the total death toll in Darfur could be much higher than the 70,000 WHO figure but says he does not know.
US academic Eric Reeves estimates the figure at 340,000 at the beginning of 2005.
UK-based Dr Jan Coebergh, who once worked in Darfur, has examined a range of aid agency health surveys. He puts the figures slightly lower at about 300,000 - but he admits it is little more than a stab in the dark.
"We don't know enough about how many people are dying from violence let alone natural causes in inaccessible areas."
"The reality is that we just don't know the scale of the problem," Dr Coebergh told BBC News.
